August 5, 200917 yr Marlins lose 4-6 Tough one to lose with JJ being so dominate most of the game. But you move on.
August 5, 200917 yr Look at it this way, early on this year we stole 3 games that we should've lost against the Nats in Washington. One of those was a JJ start where he was absolutely terrible, I believe 6 ER in like 3 IP. We ended up winning that game, basically we let them have back one of those three games we stole from them early on in the season.
August 5, 200917 yr this one really hurt......it was oure taking and we let it slip.....ugh ill forget about it if we win the next 2 but damn we hado ur ace going and we ruined it....if we sweep the phils ill forgive them for this loss
August 5, 200917 yr *looks at team* *points at Hermida* *points at fredi* for having ross hit after hermida not to mention has horrible pen managing
August 5, 200917 yr *looks at team* *points at Hermida* *looks at manny and how we were 6 minutes away fro mgetting him trading bust hermida without giving stanton damn you movie critic sampson*
August 5, 200917 yr Author *looks at team* *points at Hermida* *looks at manny and how we were 6 minutes away fro mgetting him trading bust hermida without giving stanton damn you movie critic sampson* What are you talking about? Stanton was of course part of the deal.
August 5, 200917 yr That was just embarrassing. I am stunned. I wonder if the team stopped caring after scoring 4, since it is the Nats.
August 5, 200917 yr What a tough loss for our boys. JJ was the most dominant I have seen him through the first 7 innings, retiring 20 straight at one point. Then the wheels fell off.... Ah well we had a sensational win on Sunday and a bad loss tonight. We need to take the next 2 in Washington and move onto Philly on a positive note.
August 5, 200917 yr Author Let's look at the positives. Cantu hit the ball well, despite being robbed twice. Uggla reached base all 5 times. That was very nice to see.
August 5, 200917 yr *looks at team* *points at Hermida* *looks at manny and how we were 6 minutes away fro mgetting him trading bust hermida without giving stanton damn you movie critic sampson* What are you talking about? Stanton was of course part of the deal. during this years trade deadline sampson revealed to dan that the fish were 6 minutes away getting manny w/o giving up stanton in the deal
August 5, 200917 yr And the fact that Craig interviews one of their players after this pisses me off even more. :banghead
August 5, 200917 yr And the fact that Craig interviews one of their players after this pisses me off even more. the heat does the same thing too.. WHY THE F*** DO I CARE WHAT THE OTHER TEAM HAS TO SAY
August 5, 200917 yr Too bad Lindstrom didn't pitch we could have blamed it on him. Fredi you are absolutely horrible!
August 5, 200917 yr *looks at team* *points at Hermida* *looks at manny and how we were 6 minutes away fro mgetting him trading bust hermida without giving stanton damn you movie critic sampson* What are you talking about? Stanton was of course part of the deal. during this years trade deadline sampson revealed to dan that the fish were 6 minutes away getting manny w/o giving up stanton in the deal That isn't true at all and you know that. You better show a link or you are obviously talking out of your ass. It is actually common knowlege that the Marlins said no because the Red Sox wouldn't trade Manny without Stanton being in the deal.
August 5, 200917 yr *looks at team* *points at Hermida* *looks at manny and how we were 6 minutes away fro mgetting him trading bust hermida without giving stanton damn you movie critic sampson* What are you talking about? Stanton was of course part of the deal. during this years trade deadline sampson revealed to dan that the fish were 6 minutes away getting manny w/o giving up stanton in the deal That isn't true at all and you know that. You better show a link or you are obviously talking out of your ass. It is actually common knowlege that the Marlins said no because the Red Sox wouldn't trade Manny without Stanton being in the deal. i heard what iheard so i dont bull ****, if you believe me or not i could care less. im just sharing something sampson told dan leb during this years trade deadline....lmao common knowledge? ok peter gammons
August 5, 200917 yr I knew this was going to happen.it looked like the marlins were already thinking sweep, you cant take teams like the nationals for a easy win you still gotta play hard all the way through.
August 5, 200917 yr *looks at team* *points at Hermida* *looks at manny and how we were 6 minutes away fro mgetting him trading bust hermida without giving stanton damn you movie critic sampson* What are you talking about? Stanton was of course part of the deal. during this years trade deadline sampson revealed to dan that the fish were 6 minutes away getting manny w/o giving up stanton in the deal That isn't true at all and you know that. You better show a link or you are obviously talking out of your ass. It is actually common knowlege that the Marlins said no because the Red Sox wouldn't trade Manny without Stanton being in the deal. i heard what iheard so i dont bull ****, if you believe me or not i could care less. im just sharing something sampson told dan leb during this years trade deadline....lmao common knowledge? ok peter gammons Look up your sources and get back to me, because apparently you have absolutely no sources to back up a damn thing you say.
August 5, 200917 yr Man, I had a bad feeling when I decided to watch something else, when we were up 3-0 in the 6th. Sure enough, things went to hell immediately after that. Here's hoping that was the one game the Nats get to win for awhile against us, and we take the rest.
August 5, 200917 yr *looks at team* *points at Hermida* *looks at manny and how we were 6 minutes away fro mgetting him trading bust hermida without giving stanton damn you movie critic sampson* What are you talking about? Stanton was of course part of the deal. during this years trade deadline sampson revealed to dan that the fish were 6 minutes away getting manny w/o giving up stanton in the deal That isn't true at all and you know that. You better show a link or you are obviously talking out of your ass. It is actually common knowlege that the Marlins said no because the Red Sox wouldn't trade Manny without Stanton being in the deal. i heard what iheard so i dont bull ****, if you believe me or not i could care less. im just sharing something sampson told dan leb during this years trade deadline....lmao common knowledge? ok peter gammons Look up your sources and get back to me, because apparently you have absolutely no sources to back up a damn thing you say. if you really care then you go look it up yourself.... not trying to be rude but i was just stating something i heard on 790. I heard it live the day nick johnson got traded and dan asked sampson how close we were to getting manny.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.