May 29, 20188 yr I know I’m a bigger fan of WAR than others. Those that don’t care for WAR would say who cares that there are over 90 guys with a lower WAR. WAR definitely is a useful stat.
May 29, 20188 yr I have no idea what you are looking at but when I check Fangraphs, Brinson has the third lowest WAR of all qualified NL hitters. Obviously the glove has been superb, but that's an indication of how terrible his bat has been. by fangraphs he is the second worst bat in baseball. 4th best center field glove. (better than Trout). He needs to be sent down.
May 29, 20188 yr Is there anyone who doesn't think he should be sent down? [ATTACH]1990._xfImport[/ATTACH]
May 29, 20188 yr I have no idea what you are looking at but when I check Fangraphs, Brinson has the third lowest WAR of all qualified NL hitters. Obviously the glove has been superb, but that's an indication of how terrible his bat has been. http://www.espn.com/mlb/stats/batting/_/sort/WARBR/order/true
May 29, 20188 yr I have no idea why you are using ESPN over Fangraphs for WAR (How does ESPN even calculate it?), looking at non qualified players, and comparing him to players in the AL. Translation: I have no idea why you are using a site that disagrees with me, use mine so you agree.
May 29, 20188 yr Here’s the thing, though..........(and I totally get he needs to be sent down)........ if Brinson was having a very successful season offensively but was terrible on defense, he wouldn’t be getting nearly as much hate. Elite defense isnt sexy. OPS is sexy. Because playing defense is cake compared to hitting the ball. Almost anyone in the majors that’s a position player can go from the infield to the outfield and not notice that huge of a difference compared to a guy hitting .150ish. Even Rey Ordonez and all the hate he received from his hitting as a shortstop is far superior with the bat then Brinson....
May 29, 20188 yr If you look at qualified position players in the NL using ESPN's WAR, Brinson is 11th worst. That's not a considerable difference from Fangraphs anyway. But I think it's somewhat illogical and factually misleading to look at non-qualified players and throw AL hitters into the mix too. His bat is such a liability, he could be the best fielder in baseball and it wouldn’t matter because his bat is that bad at the present time. I truly wonder how low his average has to get before this idiot GM makes a move.
May 29, 20188 yr His bat is such a liability, he could be the best fielder in baseball and it wouldn’t matter because his bat is that bad at the present time. I truly wonder how low his average has to get before this idiot GM makes a move. Adeiny Hechavarria anyone?
May 29, 20188 yr I'm no WAR expert but if WAR is calculated in different ways what makes Fangraphs WAR better than ESPN's WAR? Or who says he can't use ESPN WAR if he wants to? Who's to say which is right and which is wrong if there's no definitive way to calculate it? Not trying to be argumentative I'm genuinely asking because that's a question I've always had with WAR. People argue with it objectively when the formulas are so subjective. I compare it to arguing over whether McDonald's or Burger King have better burgers. It's just personal preferences. If I'm wrong fill me in because I admittedly don't get this.
May 30, 20188 yr If you look at qualified position players in the NL using ESPN's WAR, Brinson is 11th worst. That's not a considerable difference from Fangraphs anyway. But I think it's somewhat illogical and factually misleading to look at non-qualified players and throw AL hitters into the mix too. I used ESPN because the search function (at the time) was easier to use. I normally browse advanced stats on fangraphs. I didn’t mean to mislead anyone. I looked at plate attempts and it looked like the vast majority had significant at bats. How was using the AL misleading? I said major leaguers. I had good intentions.
May 30, 20188 yr You knew that when it went 3-0 on Brinson and he took the 4th pitch for a called strike that there was no way he was going to walk.
May 30, 20188 yr I'm no WAR expert but if WAR is calculated in different ways what makes Fangraphs WAR better than ESPN's WAR? Or who says he can't use ESPN WAR if he wants to? Who's to say which is right and which is wrong if there's no definitive way to calculate it? Not trying to be argumentative I'm genuinely asking because that's a question I've always had with WAR. People argue with it objectively when the formulas are so subjective. I compare it to arguing over whether McDonald's or Burger King have better burgers. It's just personal preferences. If I'm wrong fill me in because I admittedly don't get this. Fangraphs WAR (fWAR) uses FIP for pitchers, Baseball Ref WAR (rWAR) uses RA9. fWAR tends to be better as a predictive stat, rWAR is better to show what has already happened. (this is for pitchers)
June 1, 20188 yr It’s reached the point where Brinson is making at least one catch a game that whoever replaces him will not be making. It’s so frustrating how impatient he is in his AB’s.
June 1, 20188 yr Worst hitter in baseball tracker: Calhoun .145 Brinson .152 Brinson needs a few more 0-4s to start making up some serious ground because Calhoun is slowly distancing himself!
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.