January 5, 201214 yr Isn't the arbitration estimate for Volstad closer to $2-2.5MM? If the Marlins pay just a little more ($3 MM) for the better pitcher with much more potential, that's still a pretty good deal. Those people who care a lot about players' "attitude" and "work environment" won't be happy. O-d T-m-r Would you like to buy a vowel?
January 5, 201214 yr Hmm I'm more a fan of my original trade draft that has Zambrano coming here and Nolasco going to Chicago, where Chicago eats Zambrano's last year, we eat Nolasco's first year, and then they inherit Nolasco's contract when Zambrano becomes a FA. Oh well, hopefully this doesn't mean we can't afford Oswalt or another pitcher. I'd love to make one last acquisition.
January 5, 201214 yr Author Isn't the arbitration estimate for Volstad closer to $2-2.5MM? If the Marlins pay just a little more ($3 MM) for the better pitcher with much more potential, that's still a pretty good deal. Those people who care a lot about players' "attitude" and "work environment" won't be happy. Chris Volstad has a great attitude. He'll go far in this league. So does Jo-Jo Reyes
January 5, 201214 yr Isn't the arbitration estimate for Volstad closer to $2-2.5MM? If the Marlins pay just a little more ($3 MM) for the better pitcher with much more potential, that's still a pretty good deal. Those people who care a lot about players' "attitude" and "work environment" won't be happy. Volstad's arbitration will be $2,500,000 range, so the higher end of your scale. So yes, it's basically an upgrade for no additional payroll.
January 5, 201214 yr Ha! I can't believe they're paying that much. What an awesome deal. And .. no more Volstad!!
January 5, 201214 yr #Marlins view Big Z as fifth starter. They'll pay him $2M-$3M. And they add to their rotation w/o trading Stanton or @LoMoMarlins.#MLB - Rosenthal
January 5, 201214 yr Isn't the arbitration estimate for Volstad closer to $2-2.5MM? If the Marlins pay just a little more ($3 MM) for the better pitcher with much more potential, that's still a pretty good deal. Those people who care a lot about players' "attitude" and "work environment" won't be happy. JCR says we're paying Zambrano 2.5. MLB trade rumors says 3. Either way, pretty awesome. This is free because Volstad would've been making that much. Free upgrade.
January 5, 201214 yr Author Hmm I'm more a fan of my original trade draft that has Zambrano coming here and Nolasco going to Chicago, where Chicago eats Zambrano's last year, we eat Nolasco's first year, and then they inherit Nolasco's contract when Zambrano becomes a FA. Oh well, hopefully this doesn't mean we can't afford Oswalt or another pitcher. I'd love to make one last acquisition. I'm fairly certain this is it as far as acquiring pitchers is concern. All they wanted was to upgrade Volstad, which Z is. Nolasco is here to stay at least 1 more year.
January 5, 201214 yr Hmm I'm more a fan of my original trade draft that has Zambrano coming here and Nolasco going to Chicago, where Chicago eats Zambrano's last year, we eat Nolasco's first year, and then they inherit Nolasco's contract when Zambrano becomes a FA. Oh well, hopefully this doesn't mean we can't afford Oswalt or another pitcher. I'd love to make one last acquisition. I'm pretty sure this will be the rotation going into the season.
January 5, 201214 yr #Marlins view Big Z as fifth starter. They'll pay him $2M-$3M. And they add to their rotation w/o trading Stanton or @LoMoMarlins.#MLB - Rosenthal So the rotation is set.
January 5, 201214 yr #Marlins view Big Z as fifth starter. They'll pay him $2M-$3M. And they add to their rotation w/o trading Stanton or @LoMoMarlins.#MLB - Rosenthal Even Rosenthal is that stupid? Why is Stanton's name even in consideration? For God's sake Stanton is not getting traded merely to upgrade our pitching rotation, much less at all. Especially in a market full of pitching availability.
January 5, 201214 yr Hmm I'm more a fan of my original trade draft that has Zambrano coming here and Nolasco going to Chicago, where Chicago eats Zambrano's last year, we eat Nolasco's first year, and then they inherit Nolasco's contract when Zambrano becomes a FA. Oh well, hopefully this doesn't mean we can't afford Oswalt or another pitcher. I'd love to make one last acquisition. I'm pretty sure this will be the rotation going into the season. Yeah I know. Just... y'know... my absolute distaste for Ricky Nolasco makes me dream.
January 5, 201214 yr #Marlins view Big Z as fifth starter. They'll pay him $2M-$3M. And they add to their rotation w/o trading Stanton or @LoMoMarlins.#MLB - Rosenthal Even Rosenthal is that stupid? Why is Stanton's name even in consideration? For God's sake Stanton is not getting traded merely to upgrade our pitching rotation, much less at all. Especially in a market full of pitching availability. Well, Harold Reynolds still thinks we're going to be trading Hanley, and Rosenthal n Reynolds are co-workers, so ...
January 5, 201214 yr Author Hmm I'm more a fan of my original trade draft that has Zambrano coming here and Nolasco going to Chicago, where Chicago eats Zambrano's last year, we eat Nolasco's first year, and then they inherit Nolasco's contract when Zambrano becomes a FA. Oh well, hopefully this doesn't mean we can't afford Oswalt or another pitcher. I'd love to make one last acquisition. I'm pretty sure this will be the rotation going into the season. Yeah I know. Just... y'know... my absolute distaste for Ricky Nolasco makes me dream.
January 5, 201214 yr #Marlins view Big Z as fifth starter. They'll pay him $2M-$3M. And they add to their rotation w/o trading Stanton or @LoMoMarlins.#MLB - Rosenthal Even Rosenthal is that stupid? Why is Stanton's name even in consideration? For God's sake Stanton is not getting traded merely to upgrade our pitching rotation, much less at all. Especially in a market full of pitching availability. I don't think it was in consideration. I think he was referring to when the A's wanted Stanton for Gio. Cubs probably said the same thing when asked for Garza.
January 5, 201214 yr Anyone else think it's weird that we went after Zambrano? Did you know that Carlos Zambrano is not left-handed when he's on the mound? While I like the deal, the bottom line is that Zambrano is not a perfect fit................because he's not left-handed.
January 5, 201214 yr Anyone else think it's weird that we went after Zambrano? Did you know that Carlos Zambrano is not left-handed when he's on the mound? While I like the deal, the bottom line is that Zambrano is not a perfect fit................because he's not left-handed. Trollerick
January 5, 201214 yr I love the perspective, we generally like this deal-cub fans writing on mlb.com that they really like a young pitcher with an upside vs Z.
January 5, 201214 yr I love the perspective, we generally like this deal-cub fans writing on mlb.com that they really like a young pitcher with an upside vs Z. Never, ever, ever... read mlb.com comments.
January 5, 201214 yr and there's still money to get another bat? It wouldn't surprise me if this is the team going into Spring Training. We've spent plenty on three free agents and we don't really have a need anymore. The lineup was already solidified after the Reyes signing, the Bell signing solidified the bullpen, and the Buehrle signing + this trade solidifies the rotation. Even the bench, we just gave Dobbs a two-year deal yesterday. I think we're basically just waiting for March/April now.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.