That should be illegal 

That is bullshit. Next time someone steals a bag, mow McNeill down for blocking the bag.

I wonder what we could get for Villar at the trade deadline.

How are they allowed to challenge again?  This game needs to be protested.

Are u allowed to block the bag ? 

So someone explain why the Mets were given a free extra challenge????

What a heartbreaker. 

Good...next time blow those fuckers up, and I don't want to hear a single middle-infielder bitch about it.  If you can block that bag, you can get run the hell over.

Cheap win Mets. Fuck you.

im so confused, wtf happened with the earlier challenge

1 minute ago, rmc523 said:

How are they allowed to challenge again?  This game needs to be protested.

It’s up to the Umps discrete to check with NY 

Edited August 27, 20206 yr by el_gmac

Fuck This. Fuck the Mutts 

So let me get this straight. You can’t block the plate but you can block the bases?

Pissed but trying not to overthink it. Get them tomorrow behind Sixto.

Just now, el_gmac said:

Iymts up to the uno discrete to check with NY 

It should be protested.  Not only did the guy block the bag, they challenged again after not having one.

Just now, AeroFishOne said:

So let me get this straight. You can’t block the plate but you can block the bases?

Exactly.

And to be fair u cant. If you stand between a runner and a base that's interference so why are u allowed to put your foot in the way?

Shut up Jessica.  Nobody wants to hear what you have to say.

Just now, AeroFishOne said:

So let me get this straight. You can’t block the plate but you can block the bases?

Apparently so.  I thought the got rid of it altogether (which I'm completely against), but it makes no sense to not be allowed to block the plate, but be allowed to block the bags.

Gaby is annoying too

2 minutes ago, SilverBullet said:

Pissed but trying not to overthink it. Get them tomorrow behind Sixto.

Don't tell me what to do

I just hope they protest.

Wait I just realized it's not even a force play so there's zero reason why McNeil would have his foot there.

Shocked the post game isn't more puzzled by this.

1 minute ago, SilverBullet said:

Wait I just realized it's not even a force play so there's zero reason why McNeil would have his foot there.

They're going to claim "oh, he was just placing his foot to catch the ball."

I'm really bothered by the second challenge thing.  Sure, umpire's discretion.  But he clearly beat the throw.  Why would the ump feel they had to look again.