Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

MarlinsBaseball.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Marlins listening on everyone except Sandy

Featured Replies

Not sure what team would meet the demands for Lopez if the Marlins are looking for ready-now young talent. Any team who wants him is in win now mode, which means they won't want to give up MLB ready players.

2 minutes ago, Entendu said:

Not sure what team would meet the demands for Lopez if the Marlins are looking for ready-now young talent. Any team who wants him is in win now mode, which means they won't want to give up MLB ready players.

It'd be the Dodgers.

They've got depth pretty much everywhere.

1 hour ago, Michael said:

It'd be the Dodgers.

They've got depth pretty much everywhere.

Trade Pablo. Get 2 of the top 100. 1 outside of the top 100. Then trade for Soto.

Farm intact. Team is an over .500 team walking into next year and we have our Werth signing.

Ng. Bada bing.

2 hours ago, SonOfJack said:

Poor David Marshmallow still has hope. 

They don't have to trade him though.

They do have to trade at least half of Aguilar, Cooper, Lewin, Berti, Wendle, Rojas, Anderson, Bass, Floro, Bleier, and Okert (who all have control besides Aguilar so it can also happen in December), but no rush with Pablo.

2 minutes ago, MarlinsLou said:

They do have to trade at least half of Aguilar, Cooper, Lewin, Berti, Wendle, Rojas, Anderson, Bass, Floro, Bleier, and Okert.

I dunno, I think they'd probably get a better return if they trade these player's whole bodies and not just half of them. 

5 minutes ago, SilverBullet said:

I dunno, I think they'd probably get a better return if they trade these player's whole bodies and not just half of them. 

Agreed, except Aguilar

13 hours ago, Major-Minor said:

Maybe everyone else doesn't see the potential in this aging underachieving roster? 

Lots of trades happening...I don't even see the Marlins being mentioned anywhere except these really sad broad statements..."Marlins are open to trade..."

I just picture an awkward kid hoping to make it into a pickup game holding a ball...or wanting to dance and no one is interested. 

I can't wait to hear about Bleier being traded for cash considerations or a PTBNL just because another GM felt sorry for making Ng sit on hold for 45 minutes.

I agree with your point they should be doing something (or have an explosive offseason), but to quib...

If they traded Bleier for $1 in cash considerations, they save $4,250,000 in payroll over the next 3 seasons ($500k this year versus a CC replacement, full $3.5 next year, and $250k buyout in 2024). That buys you Floro and Okert next year in a straight wash so to speak. I'd do that quickly. I'd be happy with this bullpen:

Floro, Bender, Pop, Poteet, _____ 
Scott, Okert, Garret/Rogers (this is the keep Pablo bullpen, someone gets shot to pen of these two)

Get a guy with options for last spot (or I guess keep Bass even and Pop/Bender/Garrett have options) and your call-up pool is him, Neidert, Sixto, and eventually Eury and Eder. They should find some more relievers with options for injuries, but they can take 2-3 shots at another "Head" or "Yacabonis" they can put in AAA. and see if they get a "Nick Anderson." This is where it really sucks that blank line isn't Meyer or Cabrera, but oh well.

Just saying, dumping Bleier would be great.

14 hours ago, SonOfJack said:

Feels like the off-season all over again. Silence from the Marlins.

Yeah I have no confidence they do anything noteworthy, either now or in the offseason.

 

4 minutes ago, SonOfJack said:

 

The way that’s worded, it’s implied he delivered with last year’s deadline comments.

  • Author
2 minutes ago, rmc523 said:

The way that’s worded, it’s implied he delivered with last year’s deadline comments.

He said it was the most viewed and ratings are all that matters in the end.

Tune into his podcast or blog for more.

1 minute ago, rmc523 said:

it’s implied he delivered with last year’s deadline comments

He's saying he delivered a successful article to his employers and would like to do that again. Nothing to do with his tweets. I guess the trade deadline is a big work day for him. 

Just now, taiwanmarlin said:

I only know 2023 is their last chance.

You've been saying that every year. And when they suck in 2023 you'll say 2024 is their last chance. 

Nobody bounces from hopeful to hopeless and quickly or as often as you do. 

Do journalists get paid in any way based on their tweets? Because at the end of the day this is all still work for these guys and if their articles are what is gonna bring them their income I'm now wondering why they even bother to tweet any info. What's the point of the tweets if the articles are what they need people to view? If I get paid for something I'm not giving up fragments of it for free. 

4 minutes ago, SilverBullet said:

Do journalists get paid in any way based on their tweets? Because at the end of the day this is all still work for these guys and if their articles are what is gonna bring them their income I'm now wondering why they even bother to tweet any info. What's the point of the tweets if the articles are what they need people to view? If I get paid for something I'm not giving up fragments of it for free. 

You've answered your own question here - the tweets are the gateway to the article and drives audience.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...
Background Picker
Customize Layout

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.