What the puk

Ok that got deyvison de Los Santos holy shit. I absolutely love this 

BENDIX COOKIN'

Andrew Pintar included. Infielder. Not much of a hitter but that's OK, Deyvison is the package.

1 minute ago, Michael said:

Andrew Pintar included. Infielder. Not much of a hitter but that's OK, Deyvison is the package.

Deyison is a huge get 

1 minute ago, pollythewog said:

Deyison is a huge get 

Davey's Son

 - @SongInTheAir, probably

3 minutes ago, pollythewog said:

Deyison is a huge get 

And Scott should bring back even better tbh

We actually made a good deal?

De los Santos looks very good and only 21. 

Edited July 26, 20241 yr by WSE

that's what I call Bending the Dix in a deal

Cookdix is Bending

If this is what we got for Puk, what are we getting for Scott??

I’m stealing a joke from the other place….

 

when do we acquire Nightvision de los Santos ?

Hopefully when we inevitably trade him in a few years for the latest rebuild, we won’t trade him in the Deyvison

A prospect is a prospect but I like that trade. 

1 hour ago, Michael said:

If this is what we got for Puk, what are we getting for Scott??

Less years control so prob similar return 

I'm just here to check if we like this trade.

 

Deyvision by subtraction?

Seems like a good return for Puk.

Based on the numbers and the strikeout rate, we basically traded for another version of Griffin Conine, who we already have and severely weaken our bullpen. Of course we're not winning anything, so what does it matter as long as we can save the money. To me this is just another version of, let's wait a few years before we tell you to wait a few years.

56 minutes ago, fish53 said:

Based on the numbers and the strikeout rate, we basically traded for another version of Griffin Conine, who we already have and severely weaken our bullpen. Of course we're not winning anything, so what does it matter as long as we can save the money. To me this is just another version of, let's wait a few years before we tell you to wait a few years.

Something tells me you only looked at the strikeout rate. Lol

1 hour ago, fish53 said:

Based on the numbers and the strikeout rate, we basically traded for another version of Griffin Conine, who we already have and severely weaken our bullpen. Of course we're not winning anything, so what does it matter as long as we can save the money. To me this is just another version of, let's wait a few years before we tell you to wait a few years.

Have you followed the Marlins before?

Maybe Bendix has Deyvison for this team's direction after all.

1 hour ago, fish53 said:

Based on the numbers and the strikeout rate, we basically traded for another version of Griffin Conine, who we already have and severely weaken our bullpen. Of course we're not winning anything, so what does it matter as long as we can save the money. To me this is just another version of, let's wait a few years before we tell you to wait a few years.

Puk was not going to be part of the future for this team and who honestly cares if it weakens our bullpen in a season we clearly arent competing anyway? This dude is also like 7-8 years younger than Little Niner.

10 minutes ago, hovertical said:

Little Niner.

Now its confusing because thats the nick name for Jeff's penis.

I ❤️ you Jeff if you're seeing this.

I like the return, seems like a pretty fair trade.  Now let’s move Scott, Jazz, Bell, and DLC and get our farm system into the top 15!