On 7/27/2024 at 1:26 PM, Michael said:

It's also clear Bendix reads this board and finds me to be a knowledgeable person, one to listen to.

 

 

I agree 

2 hours ago, Admin said:

He won't be on the roster in 2025, I'd rather give that playing time to literally anyone in the minors who may be and see what they have

Reaonable approach.  If one of our two lottery tickets turn out we contend. If both do we really have a shot.

I'm talking about Agustin and ddls

2 hours ago, SilverBullet said:

Believing in this organization 

We are invested. Myself since Clemente nunez was signed. If you want to not suffer find another team 

So yeah . 

We are coming.

Soon we will be here. Sherman or nsherman.

Do you think anybody's going to want our janitor? Like what's the return for that?

42 minutes ago, EricWiener1970 said:

Do you think anybody's going to want our janitor? Like what's the return for that?

Avi Garcia but we'd have to take on the Janitors salary too

Agree with trades obviously, but replacing guys like puk and Scott is not as easy as it looks

 

12 minutes ago, pollythewog said:

Agree with trades obviously, but replacing guys like puk and Scott is not as easy as it looks

 

I was never a fan of Puk. I'm kinda glad he's gone haha

31 minutes ago, pollythewog said:

Agree with trades obviously, but replacing guys like puk and Scott is not as easy as it looks

Yes it is. The Rays proved that. Just find some dude in the Alaskan Penal League who throws the ball submarine behind his back with a release point just to the left of his cock and a fastball that reaches 104. Pay him the minimum for three years and trade him for four prospects, two of which pan out and Cock Ballsacker fades out in year four after starting the year with an ERA of 8 and a knee injury.

1 hour ago, Michael said:

Yes it is. The Rays proved that. Just find some dude in the Alaskan Penal League who throws the ball submarine behind his back with a release point just to the left of his cock and a fastball that reaches 104. Pay him the minimum for three years and trade him for four prospects, two of which pan out and Cock Ballsacker fades out in year four after starting the year with an ERA of 8 and a knee injury.

The Nick "Cock Ballsacker " Anderson story.  Up next on Lifetime.

 

2019 Anderson was a sight to behold.

I forgot the deadline was today - I was thinking it's tomorrow.  Guess I'll have to pull up the rumor things....or wait, don't you have to sign in to X just to see things now?

8 hours ago, TheMarlinsProject said:

The Nick "Cock Ballsacker " Anderson story.  Up next on Lifetime.

 

2019 Anderson was a sight to behold.

Nick wishes he was Cock Ballsacker.

What are we getting for Tanner? Can we move anyone else?

On 7/28/2024 at 5:41 PM, TheMarlinsProject said:

We are invested. Myself since Clemente nunez was signed. If you want to not suffer find another team 

So yeah . 

We are coming.

Soon we will be here. Sherman or nsherman.

Lol

11 hours ago, Michael said:

Penal

30 minutes ago, flsportsfan83 said:

What are we getting for Tanner? Can we move anyone else?

DLC, probably a couple of other relievers.

Also an outside shot Jesus Sanchez gets moved, in my opinion.

35 minutes ago, Valid said:

DLC, probably a couple of other relievers.

Also an outside shot Jesus Sanchez gets moved, in my opinion.

Sanchez is a Bendix guy and a Bendix type player so seems unlikely. 

i don’t see how DLC has any value besides a weak side platoon DH but who knows!  He is cheap and cost controlled 

7 minutes ago, pollythewog said:

Sanchez is a Bendix guy and a Bendix type player so seems unlikely. 

i don’t see how DLC has any value besides a weak side platoon DH but who knows!  He is cheap and cost controlled 

DLC at least has some pop, so I could see a team really desperate for a bat making a play for him. Definitely doesn't have much value, but the trade market is really thin.

@Michael fav player 😭😭

1 hour ago, flsportsfan83 said:

What are we getting for Tanner? Can we move anyone else?

Anyone making over the minimum is a tradeable candidate.  DLC goes to Arby 1 next year, so keep him, at the moment.  Production is secondary to the Marlins.  Are we building an offense around prospects and minimum salary players only?  And next year with our pitching staff coming back, if kept, is pretty damned good, barring injury, of course.  What's the plan?  When these young bats, if they meet the hopeful expectations, can produce, the staff will be too expensive and bye bye Sandy, Lizard, Weathers, even Trevor.  We are very unbalanced in this scenario.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2024/07/marlins-could-trade-multiple-relievers.html
 

Apparently we are shopping Scott, Cronin, Brazoban, Nardi, Faucher, Bender, Rogers, and De La Cruz.   A lot of Jumbo Shrimp are about to get their shot at the majors.

5 minutes ago, DTrainSTA said:

A lot of Jumbo Shrimp are about to get their shot at the majors.

GOOD

10 minutes ago, fish53 said:

Anyone making over the minimum is a tradeable candidate.  DLC goes to Arby 1 next year, so keep him, at the moment.  Production is secondary to the Marlins.  Are we building an offense around prospects and minimum salary players only?  And next year with our pitching staff coming back, if kept, is pretty damned good, barring injury, of course.  What's the plan?  When these young bats, if they meet the hopeful expectations, can produce, the staff will be too expensive and bye bye Sandy, Lizard, Weathers, even Trevor.  We are very unbalanced in this scenario.

I like DLC, but you only keep him if you plan on actually making some legitimate additions in the offseason, which we know the FO is not going to do.

I'm really not sure what the plan is here, to be honest.

Edited July 30, 20241 yr by Valid

11 minutes ago, fish53 said:

DLC goes to Arby 1 next year, so keep him, at the moment.

If they get a good offer, deal him IMO

23 minutes ago, Admin said:

GOOD

Agreed, this season isn’t going anywhere anyway, get what you can for who you can and see if we have any diamonds in the rough for the rest of the season.  Worst case scenario our chances for the number 1 pick in the draft goes up.