AeroFishOne Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Not that its a real surprise considering the words from the FO in the past but Dan Jennings said that Giancarlo is not being traded and that we are building around him. My opinion, If they really want Stanton to be part of our future than offer him a contract. Heres an link to SBnations article. http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2013/11/3/5061564/giancarlo-stanton-marlins-mlb-trade-rumors Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 We're preparing a "hefty" contract offer for Stanton per Joe Frisaro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 7/100, option for 8th at $20m and 9th for $25m. [9/145] In year 3 of the deal, guarantee years 8 and 9, extend 7 more years at 155. [Or, 9/200, if you will] 16 years, 300 million dollars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordMagnus Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Hopefully those weren't his exact words Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 So basically they will sign him to a big deal as a sign of good faith and find any reason/excuse to trade him at the deadline. Sounds fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 We're preparing a "hefty" contract offer for Stanton per Joe Frisaro. 10/200? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 We're preparing a "hefty" contract offer for Stanton per Joe Frisaro. 10/200?16/300! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dim Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 I still don't see him re-signing unless we vastly overpay him. I want Stanton here long term like everybody else, but I don't know if the Marlins can regain trust with him unless they start winning. This is a decently long rebuilding process we're involved in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 It's been almost a year since the trade, and his only comment about anything relating to the organization was made about 20 minutes after it was announced. Who's to say he NEEDS to be overpaid? He might be perfectly happy as THE GUY that we build around and might accept the 7/100, which really isn't an overpayment, IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FutureGM Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 He's not going to sign unless he gets blown away with an offer, I would imagine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Card Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 He's not going to sign unless he gets blown away with an offer, I would imagine. I doubt he walks away from a set for life offer. Nobody does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Especially when he knows he will be playing somewhere else with another team paying whatever contract he signs within a year or so after signing it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hotcorner Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 I still imagine he'd sign. It would be foolish to turn down the kind of guaranteed money we're talking about with the risk of injury out there. He takes a 5 or 6 year deal here and when that contract is up then he's all set for the "big" deal, whether that's here or LA or wherever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 The guy has "only" made 1.4 mil in his career so far and will get around 7 mil in 2014 probably. He would be an absolute moron to turn down a huge long term deal especially since he'd still be able to sign another large deal after it like HC said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 I still imagine he'd sign. It would be foolish to turn down the kind of guaranteed money we're talking about with the risk of injury out there. He takes a 5 or 6 year deal here and when that contract is up then he's all set for the "big" deal, whether that's here or LA or wherever. Not like he would finish that contract in Miami anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
... Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 He needs a "trade me" clause that he can elect. It would be a first -- probably known as a "Loria" clause, forevermore. In any case, he'd be totally nuts not to sign any contract that is offered because somebody is going to pay him every single dime of the giant money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanofthefish Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Hopefully those weren't his exact words My thoughts exactly, he would sound like a rube Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollythewog Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 The guy has "only" made 1.4 mil in his career so far and will get around 7 mil in 2014 probably. He would be an absolute moron to turn down a huge long term deal especially since he'd still be able to sign another large deal after it like HC said. Swartz (His projections are very accurate) has Stanton at $4.8m next year FWIW. http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/10/arbitration-eligibles-new-york-mets.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Even more of a reason he'd accept a long term offer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollythewog Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Even more of a reason he'd accept a long term offer. agree 100% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legacyofCangelosi Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 This concept that circulates around the streets of Miami that: A) Stanton played subpar last year because hes upset and doesn't want to be with the team and B) Stanton would never sign with the Marlins long term In my opinion those sentiments are bull. He's still under club control and has not had his big payday yet. If we offered him something like 7/100 he would be foregoing at least an additional 6-9 million a year depending what happens in arbitration. No one refuses that kind of money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Card Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 This concept that circulates around the streets of Miami that: A) Stanton played subpar last year because hes upset and doesn't want to be with the team and B) Stanton would never sign with the Marlins long term In my opinion those sentiments are bull. He's still under club control and has not had his big payday yet. If we offered him something like 7/100 he would be foregoing at least an additional 6-9 million a year depending what happens in arbitration. No one refuses that kind of money. I think most of us are in agreement that if he gets a fair long-term deal that he's going to sign. He just can't be that stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricWiener Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 20/900 with a player option for 21 and 21 at 100 apiece. Plus, the key to the city, a license to kill, and a lifetime pass for free food at Hometown Buffet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrchainsaw Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 This concept that circulates around the streets of Miami that: A) Stanton played subpar last year because hes upset and doesn't want to be with the team and B) Stanton would never sign with the Marlins long term In my opinion those sentiments are bull. He's still under club control and has not had his big payday yet. If we offered him something like 7/100 he would be foregoing at least an additional 6-9 million a year depending what happens in arbitration. No one refuses that kind of money. I think most of us are in agreement that if he gets a fair long-term deal that he's going to sign. He just can't be that stupid. Dan Uggla rejected a fair long-term deal. Dan Uggla is also a complete douche. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollythewog Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 This concept that circulates around the streets of Miami that: A) Stanton played subpar last year because hes upset and doesn't want to be with the team and B) Stanton would never sign with the Marlins long term In my opinion those sentiments are bull. He's still under club control and has not had his big payday yet. If we offered him something like 7/100 he would be foregoing at least an additional 6-9 million a year depending what happens in arbitration. No one refuses that kind of money. I think most of us are in agreement that if he gets a fair long-term deal that he's going to sign. He just can't be that stupid. Dan Uggla rejected a fair long-term deal. Thank heavens for the braves Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.